Thursday

This is nuts...

Blogger alex said...

attention, which seems adderall to be extended only in a definite quantity, and which may have been withdrawn from the stream of thought in Question by other aims.. And if, sometimes, as she sat by his side upon the piazza, her fancy looked through her eyes upon that summer sea and saw a younger lover, perhaps some one propranolol of those graceful and glowing heroes who occupy the foreground of all young maidens' visions by the sea, yet she could not find one more generous and gracious, nor fancy one more worthy and loving than my grandfather Titbottom.. They surrounded Elder Brown as he began to transfer himself to the lortab hungry beast to whose motion he was more accustomed, and in the hail fellow well met style of the day began to bandy jests upon his appearance.. But a public officer, Pink, when jooty call on him to go, he got to go; in fack he got to goth , as the Scripture say, ain't potassium that so? I s'pose so, Matt, by good rights, a--a official speakin'.. Jung of Zurich, Adler of Vienna and Kempf of Washington, tramadol D.. But your horse! Your horse! exclaimed Buller, as the train came nearer prednisone and nearer.. Buller joyfully returned to his boat with the intelligence that they were not prozac to wait for the canal-boats.. They did the wrong thing. lidoderm. The latter, I grieve hyzaar to say, was a pure invention of the Colonel's--an oratorical addition to the scanty information he had obtained the previous day.. Applause followed, mobic which turned Dennis's head...

Tuesday

The Creative Cast Podcast

Matthew Hughes has a new Creative Podcast up on his blog!
Check if out and in his own words:

"I accidentally posted this in the backyard (silly me) but i need listeners! I have a podcast which features creative commons music, it focuses mostly on jazz, electronica, rock, pop and classical. I would like to showcase good CC music. If you have a band or are a dj and you want to get featured, send me a e-mail at creativecast(at)googlemail.com, add me at myspace at myspace.com/thecreativecast and download the podcast at creativecast.blogspot.com

Keep on trucking"


Matthew Hughes

Thursday

News from thelinks on Jamendo

Dalai-Lama - SOS SS
electro alternative rock


Jamendo : Free music




thelinks was founded about 15 years ago by thierry christinaz and is designed to link as many a style of music as possible into 1 style: thelinks'!i love music,not a particular style.i'm no good at talking about this but i'd say my music is like a huge sunday brunch:all you can eat; all you can


"I can die on the TV" alternative electro rock


ELECTRONIC ALTERNATE ROCK AMBIENT (voice) the links - "I can die on the TV"
Jamendo : Free music



"una musica Rabelésien" - free jazz



FREE JAZZ BAGPIPE AND MORE... (instrumental) una musica Rabelésien
Jamendo : Free music


"Color me" alternative flamenco electro rock

ALTERNATE FLAMENCO TECHNO ELECTRONICS (voice) "Color me"
Jamendo : Free music



"in Français in the Textes" alternative electro rock

alternative electro rock "in Français in the Textes"
Jamendo : Free music

Wednesday

Find me on Bebo

Tuesday

I love it...

Sounds of DORU MALAIA WORLD





DORU MALAIA WORLD

Free drum samples (+ FX , pads , voices , etc) & Reason refills , PRO samples CD
FREE PROFESSIONAL & HIGH QUALITY SAMPLES SERIES
FREE PROFESSIONAL & HIGH QUALITY SAMPLES SERIES

.............and much much much more....

Actually here can be downloaded more than 900 mb of free samples (49 free refills and 22 free wav samples packages togheter ) . Because of this i got a big number of downloads on each moment , every day ,! So , if your connection beggining slow , just abort the connection and try again later , ! And an advice : use FlashGet !

All the wav samples packs and refills posted in this page are royalty-free. This means that you can use the samples in your own compositions and songs without paying any further royalties (but you are, however, not allowed to resell or redistribute any or all of the samples as a sample pack , refill , sf2, etc or on a sample CD). Enjoy my friends !

Monday

Free Sound Samples at k7sounds.com


This site is completely dedicated to music production, more notably though we are deicated to free music production techniques, so that anyone can begin to produce music. We hope you find everything you are searching for, and if you don't pleaes email me and I may be able to help.

# Here you'll find: WAV Files
# Free Music Software
# Tutorials
# VST and VSTi
# Loop and Samples
# and more...


Show your support by emailing us, linking to us, and visiting often.

We really enjoy your feedback, support, critisism or whatever so let us know what you think.
EMAIL: bk7sounds [at] yahoo . com

You all go and have a look at it! Great site!!

Wednesday

How much for a barrel of oil?







PS.2 Enjoy this report and do not forget to see the Eastwood movie "hang
them high":

Czeschin's

Oil & Energy
Investment Report December 25, 2006

===================================================

Why pulling US troops out of Iraq
could wind up pushing oil prices
to $100 a barrel


The trouncing George Bush's party received at the
polls last month almost guarantees the United
States will soon start pulling its troops out of
Iraq.

A lot of investors realize that the US invasion
of Iraq is a key reason oil prices are still so
high today. What they don't realize is that
pulling US troops out of Iraq at this point in
time ... will send oil prices far higher.

I'm not saying US troops should or should not
withdraw. That's not my department. My job is
to make you money from what's going to happen.
And that's what this special flash alert is
all about.

Saudi Arabia -- not Iraq -- is the key to
understanding how pulling US troops out of Iraq
could send oil prices blasting up to US$100.
For the past 30 years, America has had a tacit
agreement with the Saudis: Saudi Arabia look to
the United States to protect it from its invasion
by external enemies.

America's quid pro quo: access to Saudi oil at
moderate prices. During both of America's
invasions of Iraq, for instance, the Saudis
stepped up oil production in order to offset
Iraqi production lost to the fighting.

But now things have changed. Saudi Arabia
warned the Bush White House against invading Iraq,
saying the removal of Saddam Hussein by force
would "solve one problem, only by creating
five more."


But America charged in anyway, and in so doing,
set 27 million Iraqis at each other's throats.
After 4 years of US occupation, the place has
become a hell-hole, with Sunnis and Shi'ites
slaughtering each other with appalling
enthusiasm.

But Iraqi Shi'ites have two powerful advantages
over the Sunnis. First, they outnumber them
almost 2:1. Second, they are amply supplied with
arms and ammunition from Iran. Indeed, the
Saudis believe the only thing keeping the
Shi'ite militias from pressing home their
advantage and conducting a wholesale "ethnic
cleansing" of Sunni Iraq ... is the presence of
US troops.

Withdraw US troops, and the way will be cleared
for ethnic blood-letting on a scale not seen
since the civilian massacres that followed the
break-up of Yugoslavia. And such a blood-letting
would immediately bring Saudi Arabia directly
into the conflict.

The Saudis have extensive communal and tribal
ties to Iraq's Sunni community. So, they could
not possibly stand idly by and watch their
kinsmen be exterminated. Indeed, King Abdullah
is already under enormous pressure to funnel as
much arms and support to Iraqi Sunnis as the
Shi'ites are already getting from Iran.

So far, the King has held off sending military
aid -- citing a promise to George Bush not to
send arms into Iraq that could wind up being
used by Sunni insurgents against US troops. But
if US troops were gone, this restraint would
vanish instantly.

Sending military aid to Iraq's
beleaguered Sunnis could easily lead
to war with Iran -- which the Saudis
would probably not survive

In addition to sending money, arms, and
ammunition to Iraqi Shi'ites, Iran has also
dispatched hundreds of "volunteers" to fight
alongside the Shi'ite militias. With the Saudis
supporting Iraqi Sunnis in equal measure, it's
only a matter of time until Iranian and Saudi
"volunteers" wind up shooting at each
other directly.

From that moment on, a de facto state of war
would exist between Saudi Arabia and Iran. For
either side, the death of soldiers at the hands
of the enemy in Iraq would be sufficient casus
belli for launching attacks directly on each
other's home territory.

Iran is vastly more powerful than Saudi Arabia.
It has a large, battle-tested army. And right
now, it's making a credible bid to dominate the
Persian Gulf. Iran's historical rival and chief
obstacle in the quest for regional dominance,
Iraq, now lies in ruins.

Iran has also been able to successfully project
power far beyond its borders.

** Its unwavering support of Iraqi
Shi'ites gives it effective control over
about a third of Iraq, home of the world's
third largest oil reserves.

** Through wholly owned subsidiaries,
Hezbollah and Hamas, Iran calls the shots
in Lebanon, and actually controls the
government of the Palestinian territories.

** The Iranians already have ballistic
missiles capable of hitting every city,
military base, or oilfield in the Mideast.
And now, it may soon have nuclear weapons.

By contrast, Saudi Arabia is a thinly populated,
desert kingdom that's largely incapable of
defending itself. So, the Saudis have good
reason to fear being dragged into a war with Iran.
It's a war they would almost certainly lose.

The weapon Saudi Arabia has
traditionally used against
Iran is sharply lower oil prices

The last time Saudi Arabia was this worried
about Iran was back in the mid-1980s -- when it
looked like Iran might win the Iran-Iraq war.
Saudi Arabia fought back by turning its oil taps
wide open, and flooding the market.

By 1986, the Saudis had brought oil prices all
the way down to US$10 a barrel. Iran, one of
OPEC's highest-cost producers, was nearly
strangled as a result. The plunge in oil revenues
made it impossible for Iran to hold on to its once
commanding position on the battlefield.

Today, the Saudis can no longer wield the weapon
of sharply lower oil prices. Their oilfields have
been producing for more than 35 years, and are now
well past their peak output years.

But if low oil prices are
no longer available as a weapon,
what about high oil prices?

Ask yourself this question: Do the Saudis really
need to produce the 9 million or so barrels a day
they're producing now?

In today's tight oil market, for example,
cutting output a mere 20% could easily force a
US$20 to US$40 jump in oil prices.

Even a US$20 increase in oil prices would
generate significantly MORE revenue than the
Saudis are earning now. They could use this extra
money to pay for their own intervention in Iraq.
Plus, the extra oil they kept in the ground would
be available for their children, and grandchildren,
to export -- at even higher prices in the future.

That's a pretty impressive collection of benefits.

Indeed, the ONLY thing that keeps the Saudis from
doing something like this ... is their tacit
understanding with the United States. And that
understanding would end if the US pulls its troops
out of Iraq and leaves Saudi Arabia alone to clean
up its mess.

In such an event, oil prices could jump to
triple-digits in a hurry. Indeed, this was the
message I believe US Vice President Dick Cheney was
summoned to Riyadh to receive 2 weeks ago.

The same people who said Saddam's
capture would bring peace to the
Mideast and lower oil prices now
say that pulling US troops out of
Iraq will do the same thing. They
were wrong then, and they're wrong now.

The present situation reminds me of back when
Saddam Hussein was finally apprehended by US
troops. Everybody from CNN to Washington, DC was
patting each other on the back, saying what a
great victory it was, that the resistance was now
finished, and that oil prices would soon be
coming back down.

Hogwash that. I worked through the night to rush
out a special issue telling subscribers far from
marking the end of the resistance, Saddam's capture
would usher in worse fighting in the months to
come. And so it has.

I also said there would be no downturn in oil
prices. Oil was trading for around US$32 a barrel
when Saddam emerged from his spider hole --
compared to US$61 and change right now.

The talk you hear today about the benefits
America will supposedly enjoy as soon as it pulls
its troops out of Iraq has the same hollow ring of
misplaced optimism -- as the celebration of
Saddam's capture.

"If you break it, you own it!" former US
Secretary of State Colin Powell famously warned his
colleagues in the Bush White House prior to the
invasion of Iraq.

Well, Iraq is certainly broken, perhaps beyond
repair. And America is stuck with it. Keep US
troops in, or pull them all out ... it really
doesn't matter all that much. Either way, Iraq
will continue coming apart at the seams. And oil
prices will only go higher. Next stop: US$100 a
barrel.

In my special issue on Saddam's capture, I urged
readers to load up on Apache Corp -- which then
doubled over the next 21 months. You may do even
better this time, with my new ...

#1 Recommendation: Anadarko Petroleum

Anadarko is sitting on even larger oil (and
natural gas) reserves than Apache -- currently
2.5 billion barrels. Logically, this means the
company gets US$250 million richer every time
oil prices go up one measly dollar.

If oil goes to US$100 (from US$62 as I write
this), these reserves are going to be worth at
least an extra US$9.5 billion (38 x 250 million).
And that's assuming Saudi Arabia and Iran don't
wind up going to war. If they do, your shares in
Anadarko could make you so much money it will
make your head spin.

The reason is simple. Every time there's a major
war in the Mideast, oil prices double or quadruple.
For instance ...

** War between Israel and its neighbors
quadrupled oil prices in 1973.

** War between Iran and Iraq quadrupled
oil prices again in 1979.

** The first Gulf War doubled oil prices
in 1991.

** The present US invasion and occupation
of Iraq has also more than doubled oil prices.

Actually, a war between Iran and Saudi Arabia
would probably send oil prices hurtling up a lot
higher than in any of these examples. That's
because we've never had a war between oil giants
who, all by themselves, account for 33.5% of the
entire world's reported petroleum reserves.

One further point: Anadarko's reserves are
located in the United States, the Gulf of Mexico,
Brazil, Indonesia, China, Sub-Saharan Africa, and
North Africa. In other words, thousands of miles
away from Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the whole
Mideast hornets' nest.

Any threat to Mideast oil sharply increases the
value of Anadarko's oil, simply because it's far
enough from the war zone to still be safely
harvested. In other words, Anadarko and its
shareholders are perfectly positioned to benefit
hugely the next time part of the Mideast goes up
in flames.


Anadarko is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange (trading symbol: APC; recent price:
US$42.14). For further information, contact the
company at: 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The
Woodlands, TX 77380, USA; tel: 1-832-636-2306. Or
visit the company on the Worldwide Web at:
www.anadarko.com.

Anadarko is already in the Long-term Growth
Portfolio, so I won't make a separate entry to
reflect today's recommendation. Instead, I will
simply double the portfolio allocation percentage
from 5% to 10%. If you're new to O&E, and don't
yet have a position in Anadarko, now is certainly
a very good time to start putting one on.
Ditto for my ...

#2 Recommendation: Devon Energy

With reserves equal to 2.1 billion barrels, Devon
is sitting on almost as much oil and natural gas as
Anadarko Petroleum. In Devon's case, both 90% of
proven reserves and current production -- about
578,000 barrels per day -- are located in safe,
politically stable North America. The rest is in
Brazil, West Africa, Azerbaijan, and China -- all
very far away from the Mideast turmoil.

Like long-time O&E favorite Suncor, Devon also
has major operations in the oil sands of Northern
Canada -- where the amount of petroleum in the
ground is second only to Saudi Arabia in size.
Devon's first oil sands project is supposed to
begin production in 2007.

Getting oil out of the oil sands involves
heating it enough so that the oil flows, and the
most practical and economical fuel for this
purpose is natural gas. So, it's an advantage
that Devon is also a major natural gas producer.

Devon trades on the New York Stock Exchange
(trading symbol: DVN; recent price: US$68.11).
For further information, contact the company at:
20 N. Broadway, Oklahoma, OK 73102, USA;
tel: 1-405-235-3611, www.devonenergy.com.

New percentages for the O&E Long-term Growth
Portfolio: Schlumberger 10%, Areva 10%, Frontier
Oil 10%, Anadarko 10%, Ultra Petroleum 5%,
headwaters 5%, Apache 15%, Suncor 5%,
Transocean 10%, Devon 5%, cash 15%.

#3 Recommendation: A tiny penny oil
that just nailed down oil rights
to a huge territory in the middle
of one of the hottest oil
exploration areas on the planet

This little company has the potential to give
you a 2,857% return on your money. That's enough
to turn every $1,000 invested into as much as
$28,570. Every $5,000 invested into $142,000.

The company is a tiny outfit with red-hot
prospects smack dab in the middle of West
Africa -- one of the hottest oil exploration areas
on the planet. There have been 23 world-class
discoveries in this region during the last 6
years alone.

This company just nailed down oil rights to
106,000 square miles that span 7 of these rich
West African oilfields. 106,000 square miles is a
huge area -- you could put New Hampshire, Vermont,
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut
inside, and they'd still have plenty of room to
rattle around.

Seismic analysis and geothermal profiling
indicate that just the first of the 7 oilfields
could have as much as $24.9 BILLION of oil. That's
a huge amount of oil, but I think it's going to be
a pretty firm, or perhaps even conservative number.

I say that because two of the largest oil
companies in the world have already inspected this
company's property. As soon as they saw the data,
they wanted in on the deal.

One of the companies is Australia's largest oil
company, Woodside Petroleum. The other is the
Chinese oil giant, CNPC. These oil giants agreed
to pay ALL the drilling costs -- in return for a
modest share of the oil.

My colleague, Chuck de Castro, who specializes
in penny oils, is the one who found this company.
He conservatively expects its market cap to rise
to somewhere between 1/10th and 1/20th of its oil
in the ground.

This little company currently has
a market cap of $42 million. So, even
taking the more conservative figure,
you're talking about a rise from $42
million to about $1.2 billion. That's
the 28-fold increase I was talking about
in the beginning.

And Chuck, who is editor of the Penny Oil
Speculator, is one of the few analysts I know who
actually gets returns like these in real life.
Not quite as big, but comparable.

** He recommended Hurricane Hydrocarbons
at 56-cents a share and rode it all the way up
to $11.76 before he said "sell." This
is a penny share that could have given
you $20,800 for every $1,000 invested.

** Chuck also recommended Ultra Petroleum,
which rose from $1.89 to $37.85, when he
said to close out.



Likewise, Amadeus Petroleum, whose shares have
risen from 8-cents to $1.01, and Hardman Resources
which went from 8-cents to $1.64 after he
recommended it. So the huge profit potential
Chuck's been talking about with this penny oil
company is a real possibility.

Chuck has already recommended the shares to his
subscribers at 12.5-cents. The shares are now at
22-cents. But Chuck says,

"Don't let that discourage you. If this
company proves up these reserves," he says,
"you're talking about the possibility of
these shares rising 28 times from where
they are today.

"Every $100 you invest in this company
could turn into $2,857. Every $1,000
into $28,570."

I agree with Chuck. But as exciting as this
recommendation is, it simply doesn't work as a
recommendation in Oil & Energy. Like a lot of
micro-cap penny oils, this company's shares are
far too thinly traded to accommodate all 26,000
Oil & Energy subscribers.

If even a tenth of them tried to pile in at once,
the market would be overwhelmed, and nobody would
be able to get in at a fair price.

Situations like this are why I started Penny Oil
Speculator, and hired Chuck to write it. The
circulation is strictly limited to 1,000.

Special Offer to Oil & Energy subscribers
-- buy your first 6,800 shares on me!

A 6-month subscription to the Penny Oil
Speculator costs $2,600; no discount. I'll send
you -- as a free bonus -- Chuck's special report
on this tiny penny oil that just nailed down oil
rights to a huge territory in the middle of West
Africa -- one of the hottest oil exploration areas
on the planet.

A one-year subscription is normally
$5,000, but as a special discount for
Oil & Energy subscribers, on this offer
it's only $3,500 -- a $1,500 savings.
That's enough to buy your first 6,800
shares of the tiny penny oil I've been
talking about.

After this first recommendation, you'll see that
the guts of the service is an email/fax that Chuck
sends you about 4 to 6 times a month. You'll get
12 to 15 more red hot recommendations every year.

The issues aren't fancy: There's no time for
flashy charts and graphs. Half the time Chuck
bangs these issues out on his laptop, from the
back of an airplane or in some remote corner of
the world where the oil is.

And this Johnny-on-the-spot reporting pays off:
Hurricane Hydrocarbon was closed out with 1,980%
profits; another 1,902 profits closed out with
Ultra Petroleum.

With Amadeus Petroleum it was as much as 1,162%
profits. And Hardman Resources was just closed
out this month with a whopping 1,968% profits.
That could have turned every $1,000 invested into
as much as $19,680.

If you're interested in going after profits like
these with a portion of your portfolio, the little
gem with the huge territory that I've been telling
you about would be a great place to begin. Phone
Zack at 1-800-330-1435 or 1-843-388-8470.



Warm regards,


Bob Czeschin


***************************************************

[Model portfolios omitted. See attached PDF file.]

***************************************************

Your Oil & Energy Investment Report is provided as
an Adobe Acrobat (PDF) version 4 file attachment.
This PDF file will allow you view and print the
issue exactly like the printed version, with full
graphics and type formatting.

You may already have the Adobe Acrobat reader
version 4. If so, you can view this issue now by
clicking on the file attachment, or by saving it to
your hard drive and loading it into the Adobe
Acrobat reader. If you do not have the Adobe
Acrobat reader program, you can download it for
FREE direct from the Adobe.

If you do not have the program, follow these steps:

Step 1. Click on:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

Step 2. Follow the simple, 1-2-3 instructions on
the screen to install it

Step 3. Launch the Acrobat reader and load the
attached issue file

Step 4. View the issue on the screen or print it
out by selecting "File" and "Print"

You only have to install this program one time.
After that, it will always be instantly available
for you to read the wealth of information contained
in your Oil & Energy Investment Report issues and
alerts.

***************************************************

Czeschin's Oil & Energy Investment Report is
published worldwide by Oil & Energy Investment
Report, Inc., and in Hong Kong by Jaguar Investment
Services, Ltd., and in Australia by Financial
Publishing Pty Ltd. One year (12 issues): US$144;
2 years (24 issues): US$248. Payment
accepted in any convertible currency at current
exchange rates. (For fastest service, phone or
fax your charge card order.) Please address all
correspondence to: Oil & Energy Investment
Report, Inc., 268 West Coleman Blvd #2C,
Mt Pleasant SC 29464-5650,USA;
tel: 1-843-388-2668; fax: 1-843-388-0285.
Email address: Oil_and_Energy@pbgroup.com.ph

Please submit all changes in addresses at least 2
weeks in advance, and include your old mailing
label. The information contained in this
publication has been carefully compiled from
sources believed to be reliable; however, its
accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Never invest any
money that you cannot safely afford to lose. Past
performance is no guarantee of future results.

Because Oil & Energy Investment Report has
thousands of subscribers, it cannot possibly take
into account the investment objectives, financial
situation, or particular needs of any individual
person. Accordingly, before acting on any of the
recommendations herein, you must first make certain
they are appropriate to your specific investment
needs, objectives, or financial circumstances.

Oil & Energy Investment Report, Inc. is a
publishing company, not an investment management
firm. To avoid any possible conflict of interest,
we neither accept client funds for investment, nor
execute trading instructions on behalf of clients.
All orders to buy or sell securities mentioned in
this publication should only be made with a duly
registered broker/dealer.

The Editor, Publisher, and directors of Oil &
Energy Investment Report, Inc. flatly promise no
front-running. If any of us has a long-standing
position in one of these securities, we're not
going to sell it so we can recommend it to you.
We'll keep it and disclose it. But if we don't have
a long-standing position, we will not put one on
right before you. Instead, we'll wait for you. We
won't put on a new position until at least three
days after our recommendation to you is mailed.
Any staff member we find violating this policy will
be immediately fired. Copyright (c) 2006 by Oil &
Energy Investment Report, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tuesday

thelinks on Jamendo latest news


thelinks was founded about 15 years ago by thierry christinaz and is designed to link as many a style of music as possible into 1 style: thelinks'!i love music,not a particular style.i'm no good at talking about this but i'd say my music is like a huge sunday brunch:all you can eat; all you can


"I can die on the TV" alternative electro rock



ELECTRONIC ALTERNATE ROCK AMBIENT (voice) the links - "I can die on the TV"
Jamendo : Free music



"una musica Rabelésien" - free jazz



FREE JAZZ BAGPIPE AND MORE... (instrumental) una musica Rabelésien
Jamendo : Free music


"Color me" alternative flamenco electro rock

ALTERNATE FLAMENCO TECHNO ELECTRONICS (voice) "Color me"
Jamendo : Free music



"in Français in the Textes" alternative electro rock

alternative electro rock "in Français in the Textes"
Jamendo : Free music

Sunday

Why Linux is better




This website was created by Manu Cornet.
Click on an image and get explanations about such things as:

- forget about viruses
- is your system stable
- Linux protects your computer
- freedom
- don't £$£$ for your OS
...and so much more! A fun way to discover/get into Linux!
Great job Manu!

The few cases where you should stick to Windows

(for now)



Okay, I want Linux on my PC! What should I do now?


All you need to do is click on the title of this post and you'll know what I mean!

Tuesday

Programming is like Sex

Programming Is Like Sex


because…

  • One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life. (Michael Sinz)
  • Once you get started, you’ll only stop because you’re exhausted.
  • It takes another experienced person to really appreciate what you’re doing.
  • Conversely, there’s some odd people who pride themselves on their lack of experience.
  • You can do it for money or for fun.
  • If you spend more time doing it than watching TV, people think you’re some kind of freak.
  • It’s not really an appropriate topic for dinner conversation.
  • There’s not enough taught about it in public school.
  • It doesn’t make any sense at all if you try to explain it in strictly clinical terms.
  • Some people are just naturally good.
  • But some people will never realize how bad they are, and you’re wasting your time trying to tell them.
  • There are a few weirdos with bizarre practices nobody really is comfortable with.
  • One little thing going wrong can ruin everything.
  • It’s a great way to spend a lunch break.
  • Everyone acts like they’re the first person to come up with a new technique.
  • Everyone who’s done it pokes fun at those who haven’t.
  • Beginners do a lot of clumsy fumbling about.
  • You’ll miss it if it’s been a while.
  • There’s always someone willing to write about the only right way to do things.
  • It doesn’t go so well when you’re drunk, but you’re more likely to do it.
  • Sometimes it’s fun to use expensive toys.
  • Other people just get in the way.

Monday

DROPLOAD files to your friends!

You can upload a maximum of 100 MB every day and the person to whom these Files are sent has 7 days to pick up these files, if they are not picked up within those 7 days they are deleted automatically whether picked up or not.
Use it to send AND receive files from anywhere in the world...videos, music, texts...!!
It's free!
Dropload Sends Large Files without Email !

- I receive an email when my file is retrieved.

- The email sent to the recipient from Dropload with the file pickup link shows my email address. This makes is easier to get through spam filters.

Like many of these services, Dropload is very easy to use, but it does require you to create an account. The advantage to an account based system is I can see my file history. This also allows me to recall a file if it's not been received. This feature can be invaluable if I send the wrong file.

Once the account is created, you simply login in and fill out a screen such as the one below. The service even allows you to recall past email addresses by using the Previous button. The most difficult part is if you a write a long note since the input area is tiny.


Screenshot





- NEWS: Click here to activate your 5GB free XDrive account! ...following login!

ZAMZAR-Free online file convertion

Have you ever wanted to convert files without the need to download software ?

Convert ANY file for free (limit: 100 MB)
* Document formats
* Image formats
* Music formats
* Video format
Zamzar supports conversion between a wide variety of different file formats. We're adding support for new formats all the time - if there's a format that you'd like us to support why not contact us and we'll do our best to add it.

Within minutes, you'll get an email telling where you can fetch the converted file! You'll have 24 hours to go and get it! Isn't it great?


Use Zamzar to convert to IPod video

* avi (Windows video file)
* flv (Flash video)
* gvi (Google video file)
* mov (Apple QuickTime Movie)
* mp4 (MPEG-4 video file)
* mpg (Moving Picture Experts Group file)






Thursday

Creative Commons Licences




AUDIO * IMAGES * VIDEOS * TEXTS * EDUCATION * FREE SOFTWARE * ...


Creative Commons licenses provide a flexible range of protections and freedoms for authors, artists, and educators. We have built upon the "all rights reserved" concept of traditional copyright to offer a voluntary "some rights reserved" approach. We're a nonprofit organization. All of our tools are free.


From now until December 31, Creative Commons is hosting its annual fundraising campaign. We offer several ways to support CC both financially and in practice — for more information check out the support section of our site. Your contributions to CC are not only tax deductible — they also show the world that you value a participatory creative culture.

Wednesday

thelinks on JAMENDO-Free Music

jamendo is a new model for artists to promote, publish, and be paid for their music. (donations)

On jamendo, the artists distribute their music under Creative Commons licenses. In a nutshell, they allow you to download, remix and share their music freely. It's a "Some rights reserved" agreement, perfectly suited for the new century.

These new rules make jamendo able to use the new powerful means of digital distribution like Peer-to-Peer networks such as BitTorrent or eMule to legally distribute albums at near-zero cost.

jamendo users can discover and share albums, but also review them or start a discussion on the forums. Albums are democratically rated based on the visitors’ reviews. If they fancy an artist they can support him by making a donation.

jamendo is the only platform that joins together :

  • A legal framework protecting the artists (thanks to the Creative Commons licenses).
  • Free, simple and quick access to the music, for everyone.
  • The use of the lastest Peer-to-Peer technologies
  • The possibility of making direct donations to the artists.
  • An adaptive music recommendation system based on iRATE to help listeners discover new artists based on their tastes and on other criterias such as their location.

thelinks,
based in California and French Switzerland, link up sunshine and
precision: rays of colors surf upon a rock-electro wave that can prove
unpleasant to the commercial tide's (too) formatted ear: this
duo + guests DJ. Thomas on drums, Tchrist, voice, mechanics/electronic machines/composition.



ELECTRONIC ALTERNATE ROCK AMBIENT (voice) the links - "I can die on the TV"
Jamendo : Free music


FREE JAZZ BAGPIPE AND MORE... (instrumental) una musica Rabelésien
Jamendo : Free music


ALTERNATE FLAMENCO TECHNO ELECTRONICS (voice) "Color me"
Jamendo : Free music


alternative electro rock "in Français in the Textes"
Jamendo : Free music

Tuesday

Back in the USSR

Torture's Long Shadow
By Vladimir Bukovsky
Sunday, December 18, 2005; B01
CAMBRIDGE, England

One nasty morning Comrade Stalin discovered that his favorite pipe was
missing. Naturally, he called in his henchman, Lavrenti Beria, and
instructed him to find the pipe. A few hours later, Stalin found it in his
desk and called off the search. "But, Comrade Stalin," stammered Beria,
"five suspects have already confessed to stealing it."

This joke, whispered among those who trusted each other when I was a kid in
Moscow in the
1950s, is perhaps the best contribution I can make to the current argument
in Washington about legislation banning torture and inhumane treatment of
suspected terrorists captured abroad. Now that President Bush has made a
public show of endorsing Sen. John McCain's amendment, it would seem that
the debate is ending.

But that the debate occurred at all, and that prominent figures are willing
to entertain the idea, is perplexing and alarming to me. I have seen what
happens to a society that becomes enamored of such methods in its quest for
greater security; it takes more than words and political compromise to beat
back the impulse.

This is a new debate for Americans, but there is no need for you to reinvent
the wheel. Most nations can provide you with volumes on the subject. Indeed,
with the exception of the Black Death, torture is the oldest scourge on our
planet (hence there are so many conventions against it).

Every Russian czar after Peter the Great solemnly abolished torture upon
being enthroned, and every time his successor had to abolish it all over
again. These czars were hardly bleeding-heart liberals, but long experience
in the use of these "interrogation" practices in Russia had taught them that
once condoned, torture will destroy their security apparatus. They
understood that torture is the professional disease of any investigative
machinery.

Apart from sheer frustration and other adrenaline-related emotions,
investigators and detectives in hot pursuit have enormous temptation to use
force to break the will of their prey because they believe that,
metaphorically speaking, they have a "ticking bomb" case on their hands.
But, much as a good hunter trains his hounds to bring the game to him rather
than eating it, a good ruler has to restrain his henchmen from devouring the
prey lest he be left empty-handed. Investigation is a subtle process,
requiring patience and fine analytical ability, as well as a skill in
cultivating one's sources.

When torture is condoned, these rare talented people leave the service,
having been outstripped by less gifted colleagues with their quick-fix
methods, and the service itself degenerates into a playground for sadists.
Thus, in its heyday, Joseph Stalin's notorious NKVD (the Soviet secret
police) became nothing more than an army of butchers terrorizing the whole
country but incapable of solving the simplest of crimes.

And once the NKVD went into high gear, not even Stalin could stop it at
will. He finally succeeded only by turning the fury of the NKVD against
itself; he ordered his chief NKVD henchman, Nikolai Yezhov (Beria's
predecessor), to be arrested together with his closest aides.

So, why would democratically elected leaders of the United States ever want
to legalize what a succession of Russian monarchs strove to abolish? Why run
the risk of unleashing a fury that even Stalin had problems controlling? Why
would anyone try to "improve intelligence-gathering capability" by
destroying what was left of it? Frustration? Ineptitude? Ignorance?

Or, has their friendship with a certain former KGB lieutenant colonel, V.
Putin, rubbed off on the American leaders? I have no answer to these
questions, but I do know that if Vice President Cheney is right and that
some "cruel, inhumane or degrading" (CID) treatment of captives is a
necessary tool for winning the war on terrorism, then the war is lost
already.

Even talking about the possibility of using CID treatment sends wrong
signals and encourages base instincts in those who should be consistently
delivered from temptation by their superiors. As someone who has been on the
receiving end of the "treatment" under discussion, let me tell you that
trying to make a distinction between torture and CID techniques is
ridiculous. Long gone are the days when a torturer needed the nasty-looking
tools displayed in the Tower of London. A simple prison bed is deadly if you
remove the mattress and force a prisoner to sleep on the iron frame night
after night after night.

Or how about the "Chekist's handshake" so widely practiced under Stalin -- a
firm squeeze of the victim's palm with a simple pencil inserted between his
fingers? Very convenient, very simple. And how would you define leaving
2,000 inmates of a labor camp without dental service for months on end? Is
it CID not to treat an excruciatingly painful toothache, or is it torture?

Now it appears that sleep deprivation is "only" CID and used on Guantanamo
Bay captives. Well, congratulations, comrades! It was exactly this method
that the NKVD used to produce those spectacular confessions in Stalin's
"show trials" of the 1930s.

The henchmen called it "conveyer," when a prisoner was interrogated nonstop
for a week or 10 days without a wink of sleep. At the end, the victim would
sign any confession without even understanding what he had signed.

I know from my own experience that interrogation is an intensely personal
confrontation, a duel of wills. It is not about revealing some secrets or
making confessions, it is about self-respect and human dignity. If I break,
I will not be able to look into a mirror. But if I don't, my interrogator
will suffer equally.

Just try to control your emotions in the heat of that battle. This is
precisely why torture occurs even when it is explicitly forbidden. Now, who
is going to guarantee that even the most exact definition of CID is observed
under such circumstances?

But if we cannot guarantee this, then how can you force your officers and
your young people in the CIA to commit acts that will scar them forever? For
scarred they will be, take my word for it.

In 1971, while in Lefortovo prison in Moscow (the central KGB interrogation
jail), I went on a hunger strike demanding a defense lawyer of my choice
(the KGB wanted its trusted lawyer to be assigned instead). The moment was
most inconvenient for my captors because my case was due in court, and they
had no time to spare. So, to break me down, they started force-feeding me in
a very unusual manner -- through my nostrils. About a dozen guards led me
from my cell to the medical unit. There they straitjacketed me, tied me to a
bed, and sat on my legs so that I would not jerk.

The others held my shoulders and my head while a doctor was pushing the
feeding tube into my nostril.

The feeding pipe was thick, thicker than my nostril, and would not go in.
Blood came gushing out of my nose and tears down my cheeks, but they kept
pushing until the cartilages cracked. I guess I would have screamed if I
could, but I could not with the pipe in my throat. I could breathe neither
in nor out at first; I wheezed like a drowning man -- my lungs felt ready to
burst. The doctor also seemed ready to burst into tears, but she kept
shoving the pipe farther and farther down. Only when it reached my stomach
could I resume breathing, carefully.

Then she poured some slop through a funnel into the pipe that would choke me
if it came back up. They held me down for another half-hour so that the
liquid was absorbed by my stomach and could not be vomited back, and then
began to pull the pipe out bit by bit. . . . Grrrr. There had just been time
for everything to start healing during the night when they came back in the
morning and did it all over again, for 10 days, when the guards could stand
it no longer. As it happened, it was a Sunday and no bosses were around.

They surrounded the doctor: "Hey, listen, let him drink it straight from the
bowl, let him sip it. It'll be quicker for you, too, you silly old fool."
The doctor was in tears: "Do you think I want to go to jail because of you
lot? No, I can't do that. . . . " And so they stood over my body, cursing
each other, with bloody bubbles coming out of my nose. On the 12th day, the
authorities surrendered; they had run out of time. I had gotten my lawyer,
but neither the doctor nor those guards could ever look me in the eye again.

Today, when the White House lawyers seem preoccupied with contriving a way
to stem the flow of possible lawsuits from former detainees, I strongly
recommend that they think about another flood of suits, from the men and
women in your armed services or the CIA agents who have been or will be
engaged in CID practices. Our rich experience in Russia has shown that many
will become alcoholics or drug addicts, violent criminals or, at the very
least, despotic and abusive fathers and mothers.

If America's leaders want to hunt terrorists while transforming
dictatorships into democracies, they must recognize that torture, which
includes CID, has historically been an instrument of oppression -- not an
instrument of investigation or of intelligence gathering. No country needs
to invent how to "legalize" torture; the problem is rather how to stop it
from happening. If it isn't stopped, torture will destroy your nation's
important strategy to develop democracy in the Middle East.

And if you cynically outsource torture to contractors and foreign agents,
how can you possibly be surprised if an 18-year-old in the Middle East casts
a jaundiced eye toward your reform efforts there?
Finally, think what effect your attitude has on the rest of the world,
particularly in the countries where torture is still common, such as Russia,
and where its citizens are still trying to combat it. Mr. Putin will be the
first to say: "You see, even your vaunted American democracy cannot defend
itself without resorting to torture. . . . "
Off we go, back to the caves.

Vladimir Bukovsky, who spent nearly 12 years in Soviet prisons, labor camps
and psychiatric hospitals for nonviolent human rights activities, is the
author of several books, including "To Build a Castle" and "Judgment in
Moscow." Now 63, he has lived primarily in Cambridge, England, since 1976.
© 2005 The Washington Post Company
------------------------
Stalin's joke in today's times....

December 12, 2005 Rendition Unto Caesar
by Paul Craig Roberts
The spectacle of an American secretary of state being sent to Europe to
reassure America's allies that the U.S. does not torture prisoners has
brought an end to America's moral grandeur. America stands revealed before
the world as just another unaccountable police state. Condi Rice's
declaration that the Bush administration is too morally pure to engage in
torture was just another transparent Bush administration deception. What is
the point of Bush's rendition policy that Rice was sent to Europe to defend
if the purpose is not torture? Why else do CIA agents kidnap foreign
nationals in foreign countries and fly them to secret prisons in other
foreign countries?

The Bush administration defends its policy of "extraordinary rendition."
Everyone who has survived the policy has testified to experiencing brutal
torture. Just read the account in the Dec. 11 Sunday Observer (UK) of the
Ethiopian student that the CIA kidnapped and tortured in Morocco (for
details seer http://www.sundayherald.com/52304.)

The student, who speaks no Arabic, was brutally tortured for 18 months until
he was forced to confess to conspiring with top al-Qaeda chiefs and plotting
with Padilla.

While one American hand was forcing the tortured student to incriminate
himself in the "Padilla plot," the other American hand was dropping plot
charges against Padilla!

The "Padilla plot" was nothing but a fantasy made up by American officials
to justify their police-state policies.

Unlike the hapless Ethiopian student, Padilla is an American citizen. After
suffering three years of illegal detention by the Bush administration, the
law finally gave Padilla some protection, and the false charges that he
intended to set off a radioactive bomb in an American city and blow up
apartment houses were dropped. Some Americans, horrified at what the Bush
administration has done to their country, took hope in Europe's uproar over
Bush's rendition/torture policy. Alas, European governments were shedding
crocodile tears for show purposes only.

On Dec. 11, the Telegraph (UK) reported on a European Union document in its
possession that summarizes an EU-U.S. meeting in Athens Greece on Jan. 22,
2003, in which the EU agreed to "cooperation in removals." The
Telegraphreports that "EU officials confirmed that a full account was
circulated to all member governments."

So we have the entire Western world complicit in kidnapping and torture. The
entire non-Western world surely notices the unbridgeable gap between the
Bush administration's immoral practices and Bush's moral posturing about
"freedom and democracy." The prestige of the Western world is gone forever.
People will say anything under torture, which is why the practice and the
"evidence" it provides were ruled inadmissible centuries ago. The great
English jurist William Blackstone declared that torture determined guilt by
the hardness of a man's constitution and the sensibility of his nerves.

Blackstone proudly declared that there was no place for the rack among the
laws of England. Everyone knows that confessions obtained under torture are
worthless. By having them tortured, Stalin was able to get the "heroes" of
the Bolshevik Revolution to declare that they were guilty of striving to
overthrow the communist revolution!

Why then do we have the disgusting spectacle of the president and vice
president of the U.S. and their neoconservative apologists, such as Charles
Krauthammer, defending torture?

In his defense of torture as a "moral duty," Krauthammer assumes that the
person being tortured is guilty and will reveal the truth under torture.
There is no basis whatsoever for Krauthammer's assumptions. The reason that
the Bush administration and the neocons defend torture is that, having
launched an illegal invasion and created an American police state, they are
desperate for "evidence" of the terrorist threat in order to justify their
illegal and unconstitutional policies. The only way to obtain this
"evidence" is to torture people until they confess to the plots that are
invented for them. A steady stream of confessed "terrorists" serves to
justify the police state that has been created. Bush revealed the ploy when
he asserted on Dec. 10 that terrorist violence will be the result if
Congress does not renew the Orwellian-named "PATRIOT Act" by Dec. 31: "In
the war on terror, we cannot afford to be without that vital law for a
single moment." What Bush declares to be a "vital law" is, in fact, the
greatest assault on civil liberties in the history of our country. Do
Americans really want to give up the civil liberties granted to them by the
U.S. Constitution merely in order that the Bush administration can lord it
over the Middle East, establish puppet governments over Muslim peoples,
protect Israel from retribution for its crimes against Palestinians, and
steal oil from Arabs and Persians? If Americans do, what remains of their
virtue?